| Title | Chance and Determinism in Avicenna and Averroes |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2007 |
| Publication Place | Leiden, Boston |
| Publisher | Brill |
| Series | Islamic Philosophy, Theology and Science |
| Volume | 69 |
| Categories | Avicenna, Physics, Metaphysics, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Catarina Belo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This book examines the question whether medieval Muslim philosophers Avicenna (Arabic Ibn Sīnā 980-1037) and Averroes (Arabic Ibn Rushd 1126-1198) are determinists. With a focus on physics and metaphysics it studies their views on chance events in nature, as well as matter, in particular prime matter, and divine providence. In addition it sets their positions against the historical/philosophical background that influenced their response, the Greco-Arabic philosophical tradition - Aristotelian and Neoplatonic - on the one hand, and the tradition of Islamic theology (kalām) on the other. In comparing their philosophical systems, it lays emphasis on the way in which Avicenna and Averroes use these traditions to offer an original answer to the problem of determinism. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1478","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1478,"authors_free":[{"id":1692,"entry_id":1478,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1254,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Catarina Belo","free_first_name":"Catarina","free_last_name":"Belo","norm_person":{"id":1254,"first_name":"Catarina","last_name":"Belo","full_name":"Catarina Belo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/132895374","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Catarina Belo"}}],"entry_title":"Chance and Determinism in Avicenna and Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Chance and Determinism in Avicenna and Averroes"},"abstract":"This book examines the question whether medieval Muslim philosophers Avicenna (Arabic Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 980-1037) and Averroes (Arabic Ibn Rushd 1126-1198) are determinists. With a focus on physics and metaphysics it studies their views on chance events in nature, as well as matter, in particular prime matter, and divine providence. In addition it sets their positions against the historical\/philosophical background that influenced their response, the Greco-Arabic philosophical tradition - Aristotelian and Neoplatonic - on the one hand, and the tradition of Islamic theology (kal\u0101m) on the other. In comparing their philosophical systems, it lays emphasis on the way in which Avicenna and Averroes use these traditions to offer an original answer to the problem of determinism.","btype":1,"date":"2007","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/ej.9789004155879.i-252","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1254,"full_name":"Catarina Belo","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":1478,"pubplace":"Leiden, Boston","publisher":"Brill","series":"Islamic Philosophy, Theology and Science","volume":"69","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":[2007]}
| Title | The concept of ‘nature’ in Aristotle, Avicenna and Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | undefined |
| Journal | Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue | 131 (Jan.-June 2015) |
| Pages | 45–56 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Physics, Avicenna, Natural Philosophy |
| Author(s) | Catarina Belo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This study is concerned with 'nature' specifically as the subject-matter of physics, or natural science, as described by Aristotle in his "Physics". It also discusses the definitions of nature, and more specifically physical nature, provided by Avicenna (d. 1037) and Averroes (d. 1198) in their commentaries on Aristotle's "Physics". Avicenna and Averroes share Aristotle's conception of nature as a principle of motion and rest. While according to Aristotle the subject matter of physics appears to be nature, or what exists by nature, Avicenna believes that it is the natural body, and Averroes holds that the subject matter of physics or natural science consists in the natural things, in what constitutes a slight shift in focus. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5188","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5188,"authors_free":[{"id":5977,"entry_id":5188,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1254,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Catarina Belo","free_first_name":"Catarina","free_last_name":"Belo","norm_person":{"id":1254,"first_name":"Catarina","last_name":"Belo","full_name":"Catarina Belo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/132895374","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Catarina Belo"}}],"entry_title":"The concept of \u2018nature\u2019 in Aristotle, Avicenna and Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The concept of \u2018nature\u2019 in Aristotle, Avicenna and Averroes"},"abstract":"This study is concerned with 'nature' specifically as the subject-matter of physics, or natural science, as described by Aristotle in his \"Physics\". It also discusses the definitions of nature, and more specifically physical nature, provided by Avicenna (d. 1037) and Averroes (d. 1198) in their commentaries on Aristotle's \"Physics\". Avicenna and Averroes share Aristotle's conception of nature as a principle of motion and rest. While according to Aristotle the subject matter of physics appears to be nature, or what exists by nature, Avicenna believes that it is the natural body, and Averroes holds that the subject matter of physics or natural science consists in the natural things, in what constitutes a slight shift in focus.","btype":3,"date":"","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1590\/0100-512X2015n13103cb","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"}],"authors":[{"id":1254,"full_name":"Catarina Belo","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5188,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia","volume":"56","issue":"131 (Jan.-June 2015)","pages":"45\u201356"}},"sort":[-9223372036854775808]}
| Title | Chance and Determinism in Avicenna and Averroes |
| Type | Monograph |
| Language | English |
| Date | 2007 |
| Publication Place | Leiden, Boston |
| Publisher | Brill |
| Series | Islamic Philosophy, Theology and Science |
| Volume | 69 |
| Categories | Avicenna, Physics, Metaphysics, Relation between Philosophy and Theology |
| Author(s) | Catarina Belo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This book examines the question whether medieval Muslim philosophers Avicenna (Arabic Ibn Sīnā 980-1037) and Averroes (Arabic Ibn Rushd 1126-1198) are determinists. With a focus on physics and metaphysics it studies their views on chance events in nature, as well as matter, in particular prime matter, and divine providence. In addition it sets their positions against the historical/philosophical background that influenced their response, the Greco-Arabic philosophical tradition - Aristotelian and Neoplatonic - on the one hand, and the tradition of Islamic theology (kalām) on the other. In comparing their philosophical systems, it lays emphasis on the way in which Avicenna and Averroes use these traditions to offer an original answer to the problem of determinism. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"1478","_score":null,"_source":{"id":1478,"authors_free":[{"id":1692,"entry_id":1478,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1254,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Catarina Belo","free_first_name":"Catarina","free_last_name":"Belo","norm_person":{"id":1254,"first_name":"Catarina","last_name":"Belo","full_name":"Catarina Belo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/132895374","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Catarina Belo"}}],"entry_title":"Chance and Determinism in Avicenna and Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"Chance and Determinism in Avicenna and Averroes"},"abstract":"This book examines the question whether medieval Muslim philosophers Avicenna (Arabic Ibn S\u012bn\u0101 980-1037) and Averroes (Arabic Ibn Rushd 1126-1198) are determinists. With a focus on physics and metaphysics it studies their views on chance events in nature, as well as matter, in particular prime matter, and divine providence. In addition it sets their positions against the historical\/philosophical background that influenced their response, the Greco-Arabic philosophical tradition - Aristotelian and Neoplatonic - on the one hand, and the tradition of Islamic theology (kal\u0101m) on the other. In comparing their philosophical systems, it lays emphasis on the way in which Avicenna and Averroes use these traditions to offer an original answer to the problem of determinism.","btype":1,"date":"2007","language":"English","online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1163\/ej.9789004155879.i-252","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":31,"category_name":"Metaphysics","link":"bib?categories[]=Metaphysics"},{"id":47,"category_name":"Relation between Philosophy and Theology","link":"bib?categories[]=Relation between Philosophy and Theology"}],"authors":[{"id":1254,"full_name":"Catarina Belo","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":{"id":1478,"pubplace":"Leiden, Boston","publisher":"Brill","series":"Islamic Philosophy, Theology and Science","volume":"69","edition_no":null,"valid_from":null,"valid_until":null},"booksection":null,"article":null},"sort":["Chance and Determinism in Avicenna and Averroes"]}
| Title | The concept of ‘nature’ in Aristotle, Avicenna and Averroes |
| Type | Article |
| Language | undefined |
| Journal | Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia |
| Volume | 56 |
| Issue | 131 (Jan.-June 2015) |
| Pages | 45–56 |
| Categories | Aristotle, Physics, Avicenna, Natural Philosophy |
| Author(s) | Catarina Belo |
| Publisher(s) | |
| Translator(s) |
| This study is concerned with 'nature' specifically as the subject-matter of physics, or natural science, as described by Aristotle in his "Physics". It also discusses the definitions of nature, and more specifically physical nature, provided by Avicenna (d. 1037) and Averroes (d. 1198) in their commentaries on Aristotle's "Physics". Avicenna and Averroes share Aristotle's conception of nature as a principle of motion and rest. While according to Aristotle the subject matter of physics appears to be nature, or what exists by nature, Avicenna believes that it is the natural body, and Averroes holds that the subject matter of physics or natural science consists in the natural things, in what constitutes a slight shift in focus. |
{"_index":"bib","_type":"_doc","_id":"5188","_score":null,"_source":{"id":5188,"authors_free":[{"id":5977,"entry_id":5188,"agent_type":"person","is_normalised":1,"person_id":1254,"institution_id":null,"role":{"id":1,"role_name":"author"},"free_name":"Catarina Belo","free_first_name":"Catarina","free_last_name":"Belo","norm_person":{"id":1254,"first_name":"Catarina","last_name":"Belo","full_name":"Catarina Belo","short_ident":"","is_classical_name":0,"dnb_url":"http:\/\/d-nb.info\/gnd\/132895374","viaf_url":"","db_url":"","from_claudius":1,"link":"bib?authors[]=Catarina Belo"}}],"entry_title":"The concept of \u2018nature\u2019 in Aristotle, Avicenna and Averroes","title_transcript":"","title_translation":"","main_title":{"title":"The concept of \u2018nature\u2019 in Aristotle, Avicenna and Averroes"},"abstract":"This study is concerned with 'nature' specifically as the subject-matter of physics, or natural science, as described by Aristotle in his \"Physics\". It also discusses the definitions of nature, and more specifically physical nature, provided by Avicenna (d. 1037) and Averroes (d. 1198) in their commentaries on Aristotle's \"Physics\". Avicenna and Averroes share Aristotle's conception of nature as a principle of motion and rest. While according to Aristotle the subject matter of physics appears to be nature, or what exists by nature, Avicenna believes that it is the natural body, and Averroes holds that the subject matter of physics or natural science consists in the natural things, in what constitutes a slight shift in focus.","btype":3,"date":"","language":null,"online_url":"","doi_url":"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1590\/0100-512X2015n13103cb","ti_url":"","categories":[{"id":21,"category_name":"Aristotle","link":"bib?categories[]=Aristotle"},{"id":37,"category_name":"Physics","link":"bib?categories[]=Physics"},{"id":10,"category_name":"Avicenna","link":"bib?categories[]=Avicenna"},{"id":38,"category_name":"Natural Philosophy","link":"bib?categories[]=Natural Philosophy"}],"authors":[{"id":1254,"full_name":"Catarina Belo","role":1}],"works":[],"republication_of":null,"translation_of":null,"new_edition_of":null,"book":null,"booksection":null,"article":{"id":5188,"journal_id":null,"journal_name":"Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia","volume":"56","issue":"131 (Jan.-June 2015)","pages":"45\u201356"}},"sort":["The concept of \u2018nature\u2019 in Aristotle, Avicenna and Averroes"]}